POWs in Laos: Lies, Fake Photographs, Extortion and Disappointment.
Above Photo – Another trail leads to nowhere in the Laotian Jungle.
For a modern-day take on the Vietnam War, POWs/MIAs and Adventure Backpackers trekking into the war-ravaged jungles of Asia – and especially the perils that may await them, see: http://peteralanlloyd.com/back-part-2/backpackers-meet-the-vietnam-war-back-screenplay-finally-finished/
In the early 1990s a rash of photographs surfaced in the US, often through Laotian sources, of what were alleged to be American POWs still being held in the jungles of Asia, usually in Laos.
As a result of these photographs, and the pressure brought to bear on government departments tasked with investigating the POW issue, an enormous amount of time, resources and money was wasted, possibly diverted from real cases of POWs who might still, by then, have been alive in Laos.
Perhaps even worse, as a result of these photographs, families of men MIA in Laos, Cambodia and Vietnam were given false hope, and some were even relieved of substantial amounts of money by third parties, in a hopeless pursuit of these cases, and others spent their own funds flying to Thailand, Laos, and other countries chasing down usually false leads and dead ends.
Who would bother perpetrating such sophisticated and cruel hoaxes?
One answer is Laotian opposition and guerrilla groups intent on keeping American anti-communist money, rhetoric and arms flowing to them in Thailand and Laos, when the US was beginning to build bridges with Vietnam and Laos in the 1990s.
Another is the mischief-making Russians.
In the extraordinary tale I have reproduced below, both possibilities are canvassed.
The truth really is sometimes stranger than fiction, and I still keep comparing the photo of the alleged POW above and the real photo of Special Forces operative, Donald Carr as a young man, below, and still think they look remarkably similar (especially the hairlines).
The below article was brilliantly written by Christoper R Cox, and I haven’t even amended it. It appeared on criminalelement.com in December 2012.
“Everybody in the world has a double, the saying goes. And for Donald G. Carr, a Green Beret who disappeared in Laos more than 40 years ago, that doppelganger was a German bird smuggler named Gunter Dittrich.
The two men—one a war hero missing in action, the other a small-time criminal, are forever linked by events that began in mystery and ended in acrimony. In between, the strange case of Donald Carr also touched upon cynical deceit and hidden agenda, baffling inertia and endemic distrust, blind faith and altruistic sacrifice.
It’s a story that Jay F. Sullivan, a businessman from the small town of Dover, Massachusetts, knows better than almost anyone. The Vietnam veteran chased Carr’s ghost for more than a year, a pursuit that cost him thousands of dollars and untold hours of anxiety. As his reward, Sullivan got the closest—all the way to the heart of the darkest of scams.
In the summer of 1991, a flurry of pictures of alleged American prisoners of war erupted in the national press. At the time, the Pentagon listed more than 2,200 servicemen unaccounted for in Southeast Asia, a tragic, troublesome legacy of the Vietnam War. And no picture created a stir quite like the “Carr” photo. Released by a controversial, California-based POW hunter, Jack Bailey, who headed Operation Rescue, the image of a smiling, jug-eared man purportedly taken at a prison camp in Laos bore an eerie similarity to pictures of Army Special Forces Capt. Carr, who disappeared July 6, 1971, while flying a covert, armed reconnaissance mission over enemy territory in southern Laos. A decorated former Air Force pilot, Bailey explained that he had obtained the photo from “Mr. X,” a Lao source who told him the man in the photo called himself “Garr” and suffered brain trauma from his plane crash.
The picture caused a sensation among POW activists, Washington politicians and Department of Defense (DoD) brass and quickly topped the Pentagon’s investigative list. A respected forensic anthropologist superimposed the two images and said, “I don’t think it’s the same man; I know it’s the same man.” Within a week of the photo’s publication, the U.S. Senate had created a special committee on POW/MIA Affairs.
Bailey, a pariah among some POW groups for his aggressive fund-raising appeals, found himself briefing the Pentagon about alleged POW camps in Laos. The frenzy also got Sullivan’s attention and for good reason—he had obtained the same “Carr” photo two months earlier in Bangkok. Bailey and Sullivan had another thing in common—their primary source. For both men, the conduit to the murky world of private, covert POW/MIA operations was Phoumano Nosavan. The leader of a small Lao resistance group, Phoumano was the son of the late Phoumi Nosavan, a right-wing protégé of the Central Intelligence Agency who briefly ran Laos courtesy of a rigged 1959 election, then amassed a fortune through opium and gold smuggling before fleeing to a comfortable Thai exile.
After searching Southeast Asia for six years and spending more than $100,000 of his own money, it looked like Sullivan’s quest had finally paid off. In late August, he traveled to a small town along the Mekong River in northern Thailand with Phoumano for clandestine meetings with several Lao who claimed to hold American POWs, perhaps including Carr, near the Chinese border.
A few weeks later, Bailey and Carr’s former wife flew to Bangkok, where Phoumano briefed them about the same POW camps. In early October, Bailey had a Pentagon meeting with Secretary of Defense Dick Cheney and provided camp details. A few weeks later, a high-level DoD team accompanied Bailey to Thailand, where he promised to deliver Mr. X. Coincidentally, Sullivan was also in Bangkok, trying to nail down a meeting with Mr. X through Phoumano.
The mysterious Mr. X never materialized. Phoumano could only produce a shady Thai character, code-named “Mario,” an alleged middleman to Mr. X who met with Bailey and DoD one night, then Sullivan the next. Sullivan made a agreement to travel to the Lao border, and then waited 36 hours for Mario to show. He never did.
Crushed and depressed, Sullivan flew home. Phoumano kept sending tantalizing news. He had met with Mr X and given him equipment to videotape Carr. Mr. X was in Bangkok, he said. Mr. X had disappeared, he soon amended, but Phoumano had compelling photos of another POW.
Meanwhile, the Pentagon took a closer look at the “Carr” photo and several outtakes, which showed electrical fixtures and telephones, although the camp area pinpointed by Bailey had neither electricity nor phone service. Photo analysis by Los Alamos National Laboratories concluded the cages in several pictures were for animal, not human, confinement and that the vegetation was cultivated, not wild, and of a tropical, not mountainous, nature.
Investigators began canvassing Thai animal dealers and soon located the compound that figured in the “Carr” photo. It wasn’t in remote Laos, but within the urban sprawl of northern Bangkok, just a few miles from Don Muang airport. It wasn’t even a secret site—at least three animal brokers listed the address in the Bangkok Yellow Pages. Several employees called the man in the photo “Gunter,” not Carr. An animal activist identified the subject as Gunter Dittrich, an East German citizen who worked as a courier in the illegal exotic-animal trade, specializing in smuggling birds, which he drugged and stuffed into his pockets and sleeves.
“Gunter Dittrich is not missing in the jungle, but he should be,” said the activist. “He’s a drunken, sodden alcoholic who’d do anything for money.”
In February 1992, ABC’s “World News Tonight” labeled the “Carr” photo a fraud. Millions of viewers saw the self-immolation of Bailey, who physically attacked correspondent James Walker when confronted with evidence about Dittrich, who was jailed in Germany on wildlife smuggling charges.
Soon afterwards, Sullivan visited the Bangkok animal dealer, where a worker told him a head-spinning tale that led to one incredible conclusion: Gunter Dittrich was actually Donald Carr. But it was another lie. Dittrich was still in Germany. Distrustful of the Pentagon, Carr’s ex-wife even flew to Frankfurt to see for herself. The man in the photo was not her husband, she admitted.
While the Pentagon finally identified the man in the picture, the question remains: Who ultimately was responsible for a photo scam good enough to galvanize even the Pentagon? Was it Bailey, or was he fed the photo by Phoumano? If so, how would Phoumano have the wherewithal to match Dittrich to old photographs of a black-ops pilot?
One former career U.S. intelligence official told me the “Carr” photo smelled like a deflection campaign orchestrated by Russian intelligence—which was accused of transporting American POWs with high-tech knowledge to the Soviet Union during the Vietnam War—to discredit any investigation into missing American servicemen.
Sullivan, who continues his unofficial search in Southeast Asia, no longer works with Phoumano. To this day, the fate of Donald G. Carr remains unresolved, shrouded in mystery and triple-canopy jungle.”
Christopher R. Cox.
Peter Alan Lloyd
BACK Parts 1 and 2:
Reviews: Amazon.co.uk: Customer Reviews